You cannot select more than 25 topics
			Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
			
				
	
	
		
			100 lines
		
	
	
		
			4.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
			
		
		
	
	
			100 lines
		
	
	
		
			4.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
| # git-cl
 | |
| 
 | |
| The git-cl README describes the git-cl command set. This document describes how
 | |
| code review and git work together in general, intended for people familiar with
 | |
| git but unfamiliar with the code review process supported by Rietveld and
 | |
| Gerrit.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Basic interaction with git
 | |
| 
 | |
| The fundamental problem you encounter when you try to mix git and code review is
 | |
| that with git it's nice to commit code locally, while during a code review
 | |
| you're often requested to change something about your code. There are a few
 | |
| different ways you can handle this workflow with git:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. Rewriting a single commit. Say the origin commit is O, and you commit your
 | |
|    initial work in a commit A, making your history like O--A. After review
 | |
|    comments, you `git commit --amend`, effectively erasing A and making a new
 | |
|    commit A', so history is now O--A'. (Equivalently, you can use
 | |
|    `git reset --soft` or `git rebase -i`.)
 | |
| 2. Writing follow-up commits. Initial work is again in A, and after review
 | |
|    comments, you write a new commit B so your history looks like O--A--B. When
 | |
|    you upload the revised patch, you upload the diff of O..B, not A..B; you
 | |
|    always upload the full diff of what you're proposing to change.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The Rietveld patch uploader just takes arguments to `git diff`, so either of the
 | |
| above workflows work fine.  If all you want to do is upload a patch, you can use
 | |
| the upload.py provided by Rietveld with arguments like this:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     upload.py --server server.com <args to "git diff">
 | |
| 
 | |
| The first time you upload, it creates a new issue; for follow-ups on the same
 | |
| issue, you need to provide the issue number:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     upload.py --server server.com --issue 1234 <args to "git diff">
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## git-cl to the rescue
 | |
| 
 | |
| git-cl simplifies the above in the following ways:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. `git cl config` puts a persistent --server setting in your .git/config.
 | |
| 2. The first time you upload an issue, the issue number is associated with the
 | |
|    current *branch*.  If you upload again, it will upload on the same issue.
 | |
|    (Note that this association is tied to a branch, not a commit, which means
 | |
|    you need a separate branch per review.)
 | |
| 3. If your branch is _tracking_ (in the `git checkout --track` sense) another
 | |
|    one (like origin/main), calls to `git cl upload` will diff against that
 | |
|    branch by default.  (You can still pass arguments to `git diff` on the
 | |
|    command line, if necessary.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the common case, this means that calling simply `git cl upload` will always
 | |
| upload the correct diff to the correct place.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Patch series
 | |
| 
 | |
| The above is all you need to know for working on a single patch.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Things get much more complicated when you have a series of commits that you want
 | |
| to get reviewed. Say your history looks like O--A--B--C. If you want to upload
 | |
| that as a single review, everything works just as above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| But what if you upload each of A, B, and C as separate reviews? What if you
 | |
| then need to change A?
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. One option is rewriting history: write a new commit A', then use
 | |
|    `git rebase -i` to insert that diff in as O--A--A'--B--C as well as squash
 | |
|    it. This is sometimes not possible if B and C have touched some lines
 | |
|    affected by A'.
 | |
| 2. Another option, and the one espoused by software like topgit, is for you to
 | |
|    have separate branches for A, B, and C, and after writing A' you merge it
 | |
|    into each of those branches. (topgit automates this merging process.)  This
 | |
|    is also what is recommended by git-cl, which likes having different branch
 | |
|    identifiers to hang the issue number off of.  Your history ends up looking
 | |
|    like:
 | |
| 
 | |
|        O---A---B---C
 | |
|             \   \   \
 | |
|              A'--B'--C'
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Which is ugly, but it accurately tracks the real history of your work, can be
 | |
|    thrown away at the end by committing A+A' as a single `squash` commit.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In practice, this comes up pretty rarely. Suggestions for better workflows are
 | |
| welcome.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Bash auto completion
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. Ensure that your base git commands are autocompleted
 | |
| [doc](https://git-scm.com/book/en/v1/Git-Basics-Tips-and-Tricks).
 | |
| 2. Add this to your .bashrc:
 | |
| 
 | |
|         # The next line enables bash completion for git cl.
 | |
|         if [ -f "$HOME/bin/depot_tools/git_cl_completion.sh" ]; then
 | |
|           . "$HOME/bin/depot_tools/git_cl_completion.sh"
 | |
|         fi
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3. Profit.
 |